| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
28/10/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
31/03/2017 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
KANTER, D.R.; SCHWOOB, M-H.; BAETHGEN, W.E.; BERVEJILLO, J.E.; CARRIQUIRY, M.; DOBERMANN, A.; FERRARO, B.; LANFRANCO, B.; MONDELLI, M.; PENENGO, C.; SALDIAS, R.; SILVA, M.E.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M. |
|
Afiliación : |
DAVIR R. KANTER, Department of Environmental Studies, New York University; MARIE-HÉLENE SCHWOOB, Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI); WALTER E. BAETHGEN, International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI), Earth Institute, Columbia University; JOSÉ E. BERVEJILLO, MGAP (Ministerio Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca de Uruguay); MIGUEL CARRIQUIRY, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; ACHIM DOBERMANN, Rothamsted Research, UK; BRUNO FERRARO ALBERTONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BRUNO ANTONIO LANFRANCO CRESPO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIO MONDELLI, MGAP (Ministerio Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca de Uruguay); CECILIA PENENGO, International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI), Earth Institute, Columbia University; RODRIGO NOEL SALDIAS SPINETTI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARÍA EUGENIA SILVA, MGAP (Ministerio Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca de Uruguay); JUAN MANUEL SOARES DE LIMA LAPETINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Translating the sustainable development goals into action: A participatory backcasting approach for developing national agricultural transformation pathways. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Global Food Security, 2016, v.10, no.1, p. 71-79. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.002 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 1 February 2016; Accepted 5 August 2016. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
A new set of objectives for sustainable development are now in place, known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and countries need to develop concrete policy roadmaps to achieve them. This is particularly challenging in the agricultural sector given the heterogeneity of local conditions, the diffuse nature of its environmental impacts, and the important interactions with various aspects of sustainable development ? from education and poverty alleviation, to human health and the environment. nd yet it is precisely because of these interactions that vibrant, resilient and sustainable national agricultural sectors are key to the SDGs? success. This paper presents a practical backcasting approach
and methodological toolkit ? developed by the Agricultural Transformation Pathways (ATP) initiative under the auspices of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) ? for countries to develop policy roadmaps towards 2030 using local tools and expertise that could help transform national agricultural sectors in a way that is consistent with the SDGs. This approach is illustrated using the Uruguayan beef sector as a case study, where productivity and environmental targets were developed in tandem with a wide range of stakeholders in order to maximize productivity, while minimizing a suite of environmental impacts ? from carbon footprint and biodiversity, to nitrogen losses. This marks the beginning of a new approach to achieving the SDGs in the agricultural sector: participatory target setting and pathway development across a number of areas crucial to sustainable development ? all under a harmonized framework provided by the ATP initiative. We hope the methodological approach and results of the Uruguay case study will become a touchstone for future work in this area.
@ 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V MenosABSTRACT.
A new set of objectives for sustainable development are now in place, known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and countries need to develop concrete policy roadmaps to achieve them. This is particularly challenging in the agricultural sector given the heterogeneity of local conditions, the diffuse nature of its environmental impacts, and the important interactions with various aspects of sustainable development ? from education and poverty alleviation, to human health and the environment. nd yet it is precisely because of these interactions that vibrant, resilient and sustainable national agricultural sectors are key to the SDGs? success. This paper presents a practical backcasting approach
and methodological toolkit ? developed by the Agricultural Transformation Pathways (ATP) initiative under the auspices of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) ? for countries to develop policy roadmaps towards 2030 using local tools and expertise that could help transform national agricultural sectors in a way that is consistent with the SDGs. This approach is illustrated using the Uruguayan beef sector as a case study, where productivity and environmental targets were developed in tandem with a wide range of stakeholders in order to maximize productivity, while minimizing a suite of environmental impacts ? from carbon footprint and biodiversity, to nitrogen losses. This marks the beginning of a new approach to achieving the SDGs in the agricultural... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
AGRICULTURE; BACKCASTING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS; TRANSFORMATION PATHWAYS. |
|
Thesagro : |
DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02999naa a2200361 a 4500
001 1055951
005 2017-03-31
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.002$2DOI
100 1 $aKANTER, D.R.
245 $aTranslating the sustainable development goals into action$bA participatory backcasting approach for developing national agricultural transformation pathways.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
500 $aArticle history: Received 1 February 2016; Accepted 5 August 2016.
520 $aABSTRACT. A new set of objectives for sustainable development are now in place, known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and countries need to develop concrete policy roadmaps to achieve them. This is particularly challenging in the agricultural sector given the heterogeneity of local conditions, the diffuse nature of its environmental impacts, and the important interactions with various aspects of sustainable development ? from education and poverty alleviation, to human health and the environment. nd yet it is precisely because of these interactions that vibrant, resilient and sustainable national agricultural sectors are key to the SDGs? success. This paper presents a practical backcasting approach and methodological toolkit ? developed by the Agricultural Transformation Pathways (ATP) initiative under the auspices of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) ? for countries to develop policy roadmaps towards 2030 using local tools and expertise that could help transform national agricultural sectors in a way that is consistent with the SDGs. This approach is illustrated using the Uruguayan beef sector as a case study, where productivity and environmental targets were developed in tandem with a wide range of stakeholders in order to maximize productivity, while minimizing a suite of environmental impacts ? from carbon footprint and biodiversity, to nitrogen losses. This marks the beginning of a new approach to achieving the SDGs in the agricultural sector: participatory target setting and pathway development across a number of areas crucial to sustainable development ? all under a harmonized framework provided by the ATP initiative. We hope the methodological approach and results of the Uruguay case study will become a touchstone for future work in this area. @ 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V
650 $aDESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aAGRICULTURE
653 $aBACKCASTING
653 $aSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
653 $aTRANSFORMATION PATHWAYS
700 1 $aSCHWOOB, M-H.
700 1 $aBAETHGEN, W.E.
700 1 $aBERVEJILLO, J.E.
700 1 $aCARRIQUIRY, M.
700 1 $aDOBERMANN, A.
700 1 $aFERRARO, B.
700 1 $aLANFRANCO, B.
700 1 $aMONDELLI, M.
700 1 $aPENENGO, C.
700 1 $aSALDIAS, R.
700 1 $aSILVA, M.E.
700 1 $aSOARES DE LIMA, J.M.
773 $tGlobal Food Security, 2016$gv.10, no.1, p. 71-79.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
16/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; KOESBANDANA, S.; MAC DONAGH, P.; RUBILAR, R.; BALMELLI, G.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; DE LA TORRE, R.; MURARA, M.; HOEFLICH, V.A.; KOTZE, H.; GONZALEZ, R.; CARRERO, O.; FREY, G.; ADAMS, T.; TURNER, J.; LORD, R.; HUANG, J.; MACINTYRE, C.; MCGINLEY, K.; ABT, R.; PHILLIPS, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; SADHARGA KOESBANDANA, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; PATRICIO MAC DONAGH, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Misiones, Argentina; RAFAEL RUBILAR, Universidad de Concepción, Concepcioón, Chile; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; VIRGINIA MORALES OLMOS, Weyerhaeuser Company, Melo, Uruguay; RAFAEL DE LA TORRE, CellFor, USA; MAURO MURARA, Universidade do Contestado, Santa Catarina, Brasil; VITOR AFONSO HOEFLICH, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil; HEYNZ KOTZE, Komatiland Forests (Pty) Ltd, South Africa; RONALDS GONZALEZ, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; OMAR CARRERO, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; GREGORY FREY, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA; THOMAS ADAMS, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand; JAMES TURNER, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand; ROGER LORD, Mason, Bruce, & Girard, Oregon, USA; JIN HUANG, Abt Associates, USA; CHARLES MACINTYRE, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; KATHLEEN MCGINLEY, n International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, USA; ROBERT ABT, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; RICHARD PHILLIPS, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA. |
|
Título : |
Global timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2010 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Biomass and Bioenergy, 2010, v. 34, no. 12, p. 1667-1678 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.05.008 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 10 November 2009 / Received in revised form 31 March 2010 / Accepted 31 May 2010. / Available online 29 June 2010. |
|
Contenido : |
We estimated financial returns and wood production costs in 2008 for the primary timber plantation species. Excluding land costs, returns for exotic plantations in almost all of South America e Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay e were substantial. Eucalyptus species returns were generally greater than those for Pinus species in each country, with most having Internal Rates of Return (IRRs) of 20% per year or more, as did teak. Pinus species in South America were generally closer to 15%, except in Argentina, where they were 20%. IRRs were less, but still attractive for plantations of coniferous or deciduous species in China, South Africa, New Zealand, Indonesia, and the United States, ranging from 7% to 12%. Costs of wood production at the cost of capital of 8% per year were generally cheapest for countries with high rates of return and for pulpwood fiber production, which would favor vertically integrated firms in Latin America. But wood costs at stumpage market prices were much greater, making net wood costs for open market wood more similar among countries. In the Americas, Chile and Brazil had the most regulatory components of sustainable forest management, followed by Misiones, Argentina and Oregon in the U.S. |
|
Palabras claves : |
EUCALYPTUS; FINANCIAL MODELS; FOREST PLANTATIONS; INVESTMENT RETURNS; PINUS; RISK. |
|
Thesagro : |
FORESTACIÓN. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3567/1/Balmelli-2010-Biomass.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02586naa a2200469 a 4500
001 1051156
005 2019-10-15
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.05.008$2DOI
100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F.
245 $aGlobal timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk.
260 $c2010
500 $aArticle history: Received 10 November 2009 / Received in revised form 31 March 2010 / Accepted 31 May 2010. / Available online 29 June 2010.
520 $aWe estimated financial returns and wood production costs in 2008 for the primary timber plantation species. Excluding land costs, returns for exotic plantations in almost all of South America e Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay e were substantial. Eucalyptus species returns were generally greater than those for Pinus species in each country, with most having Internal Rates of Return (IRRs) of 20% per year or more, as did teak. Pinus species in South America were generally closer to 15%, except in Argentina, where they were 20%. IRRs were less, but still attractive for plantations of coniferous or deciduous species in China, South Africa, New Zealand, Indonesia, and the United States, ranging from 7% to 12%. Costs of wood production at the cost of capital of 8% per year were generally cheapest for countries with high rates of return and for pulpwood fiber production, which would favor vertically integrated firms in Latin America. But wood costs at stumpage market prices were much greater, making net wood costs for open market wood more similar among countries. In the Americas, Chile and Brazil had the most regulatory components of sustainable forest management, followed by Misiones, Argentina and Oregon in the U.S.
650 $aFORESTACIÓN
653 $aEUCALYPTUS
653 $aFINANCIAL MODELS
653 $aFOREST PLANTATIONS
653 $aINVESTMENT RETURNS
653 $aPINUS
653 $aRISK
700 1 $aKOESBANDANA, S.
700 1 $aMAC DONAGH, P.
700 1 $aRUBILAR, R.
700 1 $aBALMELLI, G.
700 1 $aMORALES OLMOS, V.
700 1 $aDE LA TORRE, R.
700 1 $aMURARA, M.
700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V.A.
700 1 $aKOTZE, H.
700 1 $aGONZALEZ, R.
700 1 $aCARRERO, O.
700 1 $aFREY, G.
700 1 $aADAMS, T.
700 1 $aTURNER, J.
700 1 $aLORD, R.
700 1 $aHUANG, J.
700 1 $aMACINTYRE, C.
700 1 $aMCGINLEY, K.
700 1 $aABT, R.
700 1 $aPHILLIPS, R.
773 $tBiomass and Bioenergy, 2010$gv. 34, no. 12, p. 1667-1678
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
